We’ll opposed any threat to Good Friday Agreement

We’ll opposed any threat to Good Friday Agreement

Last Thursday’s visit to London for a meeting with the British Prime Minister Theresa May was my first without Martin McGuinness. I was very mindful of that as Mary Lou, RG and I boarded the Aer Lingus flight in Dublin that morning. I was equally conscious of this because Thursday was the day that the Rev. Jesse Jackson was in Derry to officially open the Bloody Sunday museum with Martin’s son Fiachra, and to visit Martin’s grave.

Despite the recent attacks in London and Manchester the streets around Westminster were packed with people, including many who were obviously tourists, enjoying the bright sunshine and the sights. The attacks have added a new edge to the area around Britain’s Parliament Buildings and Whitehall. There are many more visible and heavily armed police officers and police vehicles. There are also a formidable series of heavy metal barriers at major road junctions that can be moved into place with the clear purpose of sealing the centre of London off in an emergency.

 

The newspapers, television news and social media, were dominated by the horrific scenes from the catastrophic fire at the Grenfell block of flats the previous day. As we arrived into London Theresa May was visiting the scene of the disaster but twitter was already carrying reports quoting local people angry at her for not meeting grieving families, residents and survivors. Jeremy Corbyn, who also visited the scene, was being widely praised for his compassionate engagement with ordinary citizens and his obvious empathy at their plight.

 

As the media fallout continued it emerged that a year and a half ago the Tories voted against a Labour amendment to the Housing and Planning Bill which would have made it a requirement for landlords to ensure that any homes they are renting should be fit for human habitation. The Tory legislation, which was eventually passed with the support of DUP MPs, was part of a process of deregulation which is being viewed by many as contributing to the Grenfell fire.

 

The fire came on the back of a bad couple of weeks for the Tories. Theresa May had called her snap election believing she would win more seats. Having promised ‘strong and stable’ government Mrs May returned with less MPs and her own status as Tory leader and Prime Minister severely weakened. She immediately turned to the DUP and its ten MPs to provide a ‘confidence and supply’ arrangement to sustain her government in power. The reaction from the media in Britain was one of almost universal shock. The record of the DUP and its homophobic, sectarian, ultra conservative, anti-climate change and creationist philosophy became front page news and dominated social media.

 

The implications for the peace process, the Good Friday Agreement and the current talks to restore the political institutions were at the top of our agenda when we met the British Prime Minister in the Cabinet Office. Mary lou, RG and I were joined by Michelle O’Neill, our new MP for Foyle Elisha McCallion and Stephen McGlade.

 

I opened our contribution by offering our sympathy at the loss of life in the Grenfell tragedy. I then proceeded to set out the context for the current crisis in the political institutions in the North, including the Renewable Heat Incentive scandal and the allegations from within the DUP of corruption. I handed the Prime Minister a copy of Martin McGuinness’s resignation letter. It succinctly explains the issues behind the crisis, including the years of disrespect and obstruction within the institutions by the DUP.

Michelle and I both bluntly told Mrs May, James Brokenshire, the British Secretary of State, and their officials that the British government is in default of the Good Friday Agreement. We told her that in our view the government and the DUP have refused to implement key agreements on language and equality rights and dealing with the legacy of the past. I told Mrs May that there could be no deal without a stand-alone Irish Language Act based on best international protocols for indigenous languages.

The British side voiced the usual clichés about wanting to encourage the parties to reach a deal but we told them that the issues at the heart of the crisis are not simply Sinn Féin issues or DUP issues. Equality, Irish language rights, marriage equality, the Bill of Rights are all British government issues and Irish government issues also, and they have to meet their obligations.

Michelle O’Neill challenged Mrs May on austerity, the one billion cut from the North’s budget and argued for funding for public services and capital projects. With the Brexit negotiations due to commence on Monday we also raised the imposition of Brexit, against the will of the people of the North who voted against it.  Mrs May repeated the meaningless rhetoric about not wanting a return to the borders of the past . We urged her to look at Sinn Féin’s proposal for designated status for the North within the EU. It is a proposal that would not impinge on the constitutional status of the North.

We warned Prime Minister May that doing a deal with the DUP in order to hold on to power carried with it huge risks. Sinn Féin will oppose any pact that undermines the Good Friday Agreement and we will look to the new Taoiseach to oppose it also as a co-guarantor of the Agreement. In her contribution Mary Lou Our referenced the demographic changes that are taking place in the North and the increased interest in Irish unity. We told Mrs May that a referendum on Irish unity is inevitable and that she and her government had to prepare for it.

At the same time, we made it clear that our objective in the talks is to reach an agreement with the DUP and the other parties on restoring the institutions. But this will only happen if they are sustainable, viable and properly resourced. That means resolving all of the outstanding issues, and the British government providing a financial package that addresses the austerity cuts to the block grant that the Cameron and May governments have been responsible for.

 

As I write these few words there is still no clarity around the DUP and Tory pact. The Brexit negotiations have begun and the talks to restore the institutions have recommenced following the Westminster election. With the June 29th deadline next week and the marching season about to kick-off there is only a short window to agree a restoration of the institutions.

 



Related Articles

GUARDIA CIVIL ARRESTA 10 MILITANTI INDIPENDENTISTI

Sono passate poche ore dalla sentenza che annulla la chiusura manu militari, sette anni fa, del quotidiano in lingua basca

JOSEBA SARRIONAINDIA, SCRITTORE BASCO

Joseba Sarrionaindia (1958) scrittore poeta e saggista basco ha vinto il Premio Euskadi della letteratura , che istituisce il Governo della Comunità Autonoma Basca, per il libro  “Moroak gara behelaino artean?”.  La giuria ha motivato l’assegnazione del premio sottolineando che “era un opera molto solida formalmente, una grande opera, molto documentata, anche nella sua originalità. Passeranno gli anni e l’opera potrà convertirsi in un classico della cultura basca”.

Il libro affronta un epoca quella della guerra colonialista spagnola in Marocco negli anni 20 attraverso  la descrizione di personaggi e visioni personali sulle culture e il mondo.

Sarrionaindia è considerato un referente della letteratura basca contemporanea. La sua prolifica opera ha  attraversato la poetica il romanzo la saggistica passando per una scrittura letteraria sperimentale. Il suo lavoro è stato riconosciuto non solo dai numerosi lettori e lettrici che attendo la sue opere ma anche dalla critica letteraria come il  Premio de la Critica di narrativa in euskera,  istituito dalla Asociación Española de Críticos Literarios che concesse il premio a Sarrionaindia nel 1986, por Atabala eta euria (Il tamburo e la pioggia), una collezione di racconti e nel 2001  per Lagun izoztua (L’amico congelato), il suo primo romanzo.

Il premio Euskadi che ha una dotazione di 18.000 euro più 4000 euro se l’opera viene tradotta, non verrà dato a Sarrionaindia secondo quanto è stato annunciato dal Governo di Patxi Loepz. La motivazione è data dal fatto che Joseba Sarrioanidia è profuogo dal 1985 quando fuggi dal carcere di Martutene (San Sebtstian) con Inaki Pikaebea ambedue militanti di ETA. Dal 1985 Sarrionaindia scrive dall’ esilio senza che ufficialmente si conosca dove si trovi.

La notizia della concessione dell’ennesimo premio a lo scritto basco ha sollevato il consueto acceso dibattito sui mezzi d’informazione spagnoli. Curiosamente sul quotidiano della destra spagnola, La Razon, ad un articolo dal titolo “Governo basco concede premio a profugo di ETA”, un lettore commenta laconicamente: “Il Premio della Critica di narrativa in euskera è un premio che concede l’Associazione Spagnola dei Critici Letterari nel’l ambito del concorso annuale del Premio della Critica alla migliore opera in prosa scritta in esukera. Nel 1986 venne concesso a Joseba Sarrionaindia per “Atabala eta euria” e nel 2001 lo concessero un’altra volta per “Lagun izoztua”.  Non sarà che è un gran scrittore?”

TRADIZIONE E SINCRETISMO di Joseba Sarrionaindia (1984)

Le attuali culture non sono alberi radicati nella terra che tendono i loro rami al vento senza muoversi dal loro luogo. Oggi, come mai nella storia, il mondo è aperto e ci sentiamo parte non solo della nostra terra natale ma di tutto questo mondo, al quale

SINDACATI BASCHI CONTESTANO LA FINANZIARIA

Gara Più di duemila delegate e delegati  della maggioranza sindacale basca formata dai sindacati ELA, LAB, STEE-EILAS, EHNE e Hiru,

No comments

Write a comment
No Comments Yet! You can be first to comment this post!

Write a Comment